In the Network: Media Co-op Dominion   Locals: HalifaxMontrealTorontoVancouver

Support the VMC, donate today!

Toronto News

Group notifications

This group offers an RSS feed. Or subscribe to these personalized, sitewide feeds:

G20: Shut Doors = Broken Windows

Blog posts are the work of individual contributors, reflecting their thoughts, opinions and research.
Authority was smashed on June 26th
Authority was smashed on June 26th

Toronto News

Originally publilshed on
“Anarchists essentially outsmarted the extensive security plan by taking advantage of vulnerable parts of the city while police officers were focused on the large demonstration and the summit perimeter.” –AP News Report

On June 26, 2010, thousands of anarchists and other protesters gathered outside the G20 summit in Toronto, facing off against more than 19,000 security officials with a budget of nearly one billion dollars. The riots that followed have provoked outrage from public officials and commentators in the corporate media. We salute the courage of those who put themselves at tremendous risk to shatter the illusion of social consensus and reveal the depth of outrage against the G20 leaders and the capitalist system they defend. If you put your freedom on the line in Toronto—thank you.

Shut Doors . . .

As anarchists, we do not simply oppose specific policies of the G20—though the program drafted at the Toronto summit looks dire indeed—but also its basic structure. Be it G7, G8, G20, or G1000, any structure that empowers heads of state to decide the fates of millions is fundamentally exclusive and coercive. We oppose the G20 summits because we believe that only horizontal initiatives can solve the problems facing us today.

Financial crisis, ecological catastrophe, and repression of dissent are the necessary consequences of capitalist economics and hierarchical political systems that concentrate power in the hands of the most ruthless few. When all are forced to compete for resources and power at any cost rather than being free to develop ways of life based on sharing and peaceful coexistence, neither oil spills nor wars based on false pretexts should surprise us.

The kind of world our rulers are trying to build was reflected in the security apparatus set up to protect the summit from the populace that has to deal with its consequences. A part of downtown Toronto was fenced off, with “secret laws” giving police additional powers in the area. The preemptive raids directed at protest organizers were not an anomaly—similar raids took place before the Republican National Convention in 2008, for example. In making over 900 arrests of largely law-abiding citizens over the course of the weekend, security personnel were not overreacting but utilizing the criminal justice system for its implicit purpose: the containment of possible threats to the status quo.

If this is the first time police have used tear gas in Toronto, it only shows how tight their control has been over Toronto’s poor and dispossessed until now. Likewise, the petulant reactions of politicians and corporate media reveal that, for once, protests went beyond anything they could co-opt into their own agendas.


“Traditionally, crowds gathered to defend
the community against outsiders who might
otherwise impose their interests.” –Al Sandine, The Taming of the American Crowd . . . Broken Windows

Although initial reports implied smaller numbers, Toronto police chief Bill Blair eventually acknowledged that “as many as a thousand people” participated in militant actions on Saturday—what Premier Dalton McGuinty called “mindless destruction and violence.”

This kind of rhetoric is always the first response to a group stepping forcefully outside the permitted discourse; later, of course, there come movie adaptations and overtures to “be part of the process.” It’s important not to panic at moments like this when our enemies hope to scare us out of sticking to our guns. By standing proudly by militant action, we can help to legitimize structural opposition to capitalism; if we act ashamed or conciliatory, we enable our enemies to determine what counts as acceptable. Ironically, the only way to cease appearing “extremist” to the general public is to affirm the necessity of militant action until it is eventually normalized as a valid option.


It is the politicians and police who should be ashamed. It is particularly cowardly for those who have never faced police violence to insult young people who are willing to stand up to a billion dollars worth of security personnel; it is particularly mindless for men whose privileges just so happen to rest on a complete acceptance of the values of the prevailing order to defame individuals who have the integrity to question those values. If anything qualifies as “mindless destruction and violence,” it is the unquestioning obedience of the police who attack noncombatants whenever ordered.

We are shocked by the hypocrisy of those who benefit from hundreds of years of colonization, genocide, and exploitation but prefer to focus on a few broken windows. We abhor the duplicity of police who can cite “public safety” as a pretext for any outrage, including gross violations of the laws they supposedly exist to enforce, while callously and indiscriminately attacking the public. We deplore the deceitfulness of media outlets that miss no opportunity to slander anarchists: for example, implying that the police murder of Ian Tomlinson at the 2009 G20 summit in London was a result of the demonstrations there and not the senseless, unprovoked atrocity that it was.

On the other hand, we are deeply inspired by our comrades in Toronto. It is astonishing that anarchists managed to achieve so much despite the forces arrayed against them. Although we fear a serious wave of repression is on the way, the events of June 26 did a lot to dispel the illusion that our rulers are invincible.

This is not to say we should stop at summit rioting. If it is possible for anarchists outnumbered twenty to one to trash a shopping district and set a few police cars on fire, think how much more possible—and more important—it is to fight on the terrain of our everyday lives. Anti-summit rioting is a powerful symbolic gesture of refusal, signifying a willingness to go all the way—but it will be in vain unless we actually succeed in passing beyond gestures into material transformation. Pundits and politicos should count themselves lucky when anarchists limit themselves to symbolic gestures, rather than setting about the serious business of overthrowing capitalism once and for all.

As economic and ecological conditions continue to worsen, social conflict will also intensify; one day the challenge will not be to provoke riots but to accomplish anything besides them. If anarchists do not establish ourselves as the foremost opponents of the ruling order, fascists and fundamentalists surely will. In view of this, it may be important that we distinguish ourselves in summit protests. Yet in the long run we will win or lose according to whether we are able to utilize these opportunities to make our case to others, and to seize spaces and resources with which to demonstrate our alternative.

May sirens mingle in the air with the crisp scent of smoke. May projectiles rain down upon the spectacles of consumer culture. May we seize every chance to strike our oppressors and inspire our friends, neighbors, and coworkers to do the same. Now the question is how we can seize back our own communities and creative potential with the same fierceness we saw in Toronto.

Click here for PDF [29k]

Further Reading

G20 Alternative Media Center

Toronto Community Mobilization Network

Corporate Media Map of Events


Catch the news as it breaks: follow the VMC on Twitter.
Join the Vancouver Media Co-op today. Click here to learn about the benefits of membership.


Cowards who think they are heroes


What a pathetic joke this is. Now that they are safely back in hiding while others are actually standing up to the police in the streets, the ‘Black Bloc’ losers issue a statement praising themselves for their “courage”. These people are cowards – cowards living in a make-believe world in which they are big tough heroes.  In their dreams! The truth is they only go on their scripted window-breaking sprees when they have a big demonstration they can hide in.


If they are so brave and breaking windows is so radical, how come they never do it on their own? There are 365 days in the year. Why do these chickenshit “heroes” only do it on the one day of the year when they can use other people as cover? They’re like the kid who hides behind mommy’s skirt, dashes out and yells at somebody, and then quickly hides behind mommy’s skirt again.


The truth is it doesn’t take any courage to participate in these fake-radical window-busting runs, because the cops NEVER go after the Black Bloc. At every summit, including Toronto, it’s been the same story: the cops pull all their people out of the way when the Black Bloc does their thing. All the cops vanish until the Black Bloc has finished. Then they go after the peaceful demonstrators. In Toronto, the people who showed real courage were all those who stood up to the cops at the detention centre, in Parkdale, on College Street, etc., while the Black Bloc were back in their bedrooms writing statements praising themselves.


And why do the cops never go after the Black Bloc? Because they love the Black Bloc, who provide with them with the pretext they need for more repression. That’s why the cops have infiltrated the Black Bloc with agents provocateurs. They have an easy job of it, because while they calls themselves “anarchists” they are actually more like a cult, with a few leaders and a bunch of sheep-like followers who don’t have the guts to every challenge their leaders, no matter how idiotic they are. Anarchists? No way! Pathetic assholes, is more like it.



It's as sad day when VMC has

It's as sad day when VMC has a comment filled with so much ignorance such as the one above me. I hope one day you can get your head out of the sand.



this is unfair.

this is something that the departments of the police really deserves. I read the post from the very beginning to the end, and I do admire your work and appreciate what you've come up with. In this short span of time you have done a great effort for the best possible results.I hope to hear more from you.I'm still confused if the government has any alternatives, for  the injured police men, since there is lack of Surgical Instruments at the medical stops too.

User login